The True Cost of Food
No one who grows vegetables will dispute that a lot of work goes into
producing food. Just producing a crop of potatoes involves digging over
the land, fertilising, planting, earthing up and then harvesting. All
to watch a portion being munched by slugs, various worms and then blight
hitting the haulm and possibly getting the lot.
At the same time, household expenditure in the UK on food has fallen
relative to income since the second world war.
But what is the true cost of this food?
- First, British farming has increased efficiency. Labour costs increased
but mechanisation has enabled production per man hour to increase. This,
in itself, is no bad thing – Man should not have to endure jobs
of drudgery when a choice exists.
- Second, The drudge jobs left are often undertaken by migrant foreign
workers. Without getting into the effects of globalisation on third world
farming incomes, in Britain we import cheap labour to harvest our crops.
- Third, we are now a chemical culture (except for a small percentage
of organic producers). The application of herbicides, pesticides and
fertilisers ensures presentable volume production. Environmental damage
caused by excess nitrogen run-off into water courses, chemical pollution
of groundwater etc. is not directly paid for by the farmer and so the
price paid (in money) for foodstuffs does not reflect this cost.
- Fourth, varieties (without getting into gene modification) have been
developed more suitable for our distribution systems. Thicker skinned
tomatoes etc.
- Fifth, importing foodstuffs from around the world where wages are
low and environmental concerns often lower. But transport is relatively
cheap.
So what? You may ask.
My conclusion from the above is that a significant proportion of the
reduction in the cost of food has been achieved by
exploitation of workers and exploitation of a system that ignores the
actual cost to the environment – some
of which is reflected in the costs we all pay for
cleaning our water supply.
It doesn't stop there.
One point I have not addressed is the effects of this factory farming
culture on livestock. The cruelty of battery chickens and intensive rearing
of other farm animals is being reduced due to vocal advocates of animal
rights and the sympathy of the consuming public. Nevertheless, it still
continues.
The danger of this is not just to the animals. The
development of bird flu (that may transmit to man) and the effect of
routine applications of antibiotics that can cause the development of
resistant bugs, present clear dangers to people generally.
Processing
At the same time as we have pushed the monetary cost of our food down,
we have seen the time cost reduce. Peeling potatoes, chopping beans and
shelling peas became a thing of the past for many people with the development
of frozen foods. Then, of course, the search for ‘added value’ – or
increased profit – results in the ready meal.
Why cook? You can sit on your couch and watch famous chefs create
fantastic dishes whilst eating your healthy option, cook in 3 minutes
in the microwave meal, with an extra portion of micro-chips.
Health
Headlines about obesity, heart disease and cancer abound. They are
even suggesting the average lifespan will drop – our kids will not
live to be as old as us. The epidemic in asthma may, IMHO, be related
to the increase in chemical usage. Looking at some statistics gives a
very strange view.
Lets compare household food consumption between 1974 and 2000:
Household Food Consumption
(grams per person per week unless otherwise stated)
| Food Stuff |
1974 |
2000 |
Change |
% |
| Liquid Wholemilk (ml) |
2680 |
664 |
-2,016 |
-75% |
| Other Milk and Cream (ml) |
217 |
1417 |
1,200 |
+553% |
| Carcase Meat |
413 |
246 |
-167 |
-40% |
Primary Poultry
Meat Products |
146 |
253 |
107 |
+73% |
| Fats |
316 |
186 |
-130 |
-41% |
| Sugar |
371 |
105 |
-266 |
-72% |
| Fresh Potatoes |
1304 |
707 |
-597 |
-46% |
| Fresh Vegetables |
841 |
732 |
-109 |
-13% |
| Processed Vegetables |
332 |
345 |
13 |
+4% |
| Processed Potatoes |
71 |
202 |
131 |
+185% |
| Total Vegetables |
2448 |
1986 |
-462 |
-19% |
| Fresh Fruit |
499 |
745 |
246 |
+49% |
According to those figures, we drink far less wholemilk,
eat less fat, sugar and carcase meat (joints of beef, pork chops etc)
all of which we are told is healthy. The downside is the increase in
processed foods, especially meat products – mechanically reclaimed,
reformed, ersatz meat based on chickens developed for fast maturity.
The decrease in fresh potatoes and vegetables is hardly compensated
by the small increase in fresh fruit.
In fact, the consumption of potatoes and vegetables – both fresh
and processed - has fallen from 1974 total of 2548 to 1986 a fall of 22%.
So, we are eating less fats, sugars etc but becoming
a country full of obese people. I wonder how much we
can blame it on fast food outlets, one large Big Mac Meal with normal
cola contains 1,131 ckal. As a nation we eat more fast foods now than
any time in the past. The obesity ‘epidemic’ seems
to coincide with this increase.
Calorie Intake
| Year |
Energy
(kcal) |
| 1940 |
2355 |
| 1950 |
2474 |
| 1960 |
2630 |
| 1970 |
2560 |
| 1980 |
2230 |
| 1990 |
1870 |
| 2000 |
1750 |
| per person per day excluding contributions
from soft and alcoholic drinks and confectionery |
Nutrition and the Energy Balance
Looking at the figures for nutritional value of household foods could
cast some light on the subject.
Now I am pretty sure we are drinking more soft and alcoholic drinks
and eating more confectionery than in 1940 but our household gross calorific
intake seems to have fallen consistently.
Maybe those fast food lunches, chocolate bar with afternoon break and
glasses of cola (at around 100 kcal per glass) are having an effect. Otherwise
we would all be starving as the energy input is below that required to
maintain weight.
Another factor is the balance between energy in and out causing the
problem. As time moves on we have less manual labour so need less calories
but although our calorie consumption may have fallen – has it fallen
enough?
One thing about an allotment is that it will increase the amount of
manual labour undertaken and so may help to reduce obesity by improving
the energy balance.
Vitamin Intake
Taking a look at vitamin consumption is also interesting
Vitamin Intake over Years
| Year |
Calcium
mg |
Iron
mg |
Vitamin C
mg |
Vitamin A
mg |
Vitamin D
ug |
Beta-Carotene
ug |
| 1950 |
1066 |
13.6 |
43 |
3536 |
4.3 |
---- |
| 1960 |
1040 |
14.1 |
52 |
4360 |
3.25 |
---- |
| 1970 |
1030 |
13.4 |
52 |
1350 |
2.82 |
2120 |
| 1980 |
960 |
11.3 |
58 |
1350 |
2.85 |
2360 |
| 1990 |
820 |
10.4 |
52 |
1100 |
3.02 |
1877 |
| 2000 |
860 |
10.1 |
59 |
780 |
3.29 |
1690 |
Now possibly we do not need the same amounts of calcium as we used to
but there has been a huge drop in vitamin A over the last 50 years (78%),
Iron (26%) and vitamin D (23%) and a 20% drop in Beta-Carotene over the
last 30 years.
Beta Carotene is also know as pro vitamin A because it is one of the
most important precursors of vitamin A in the human
diet. Vitamin A is known to be necessary for good vision and may well
have an effect in the prevention of cancer.
How much is compensated for by fast food consumption is unknown. We
do know the best source for many vitamins is fresh vegetables and fruit.
Conclusions
The true cost of food is far higher than the price we pay in the shops.
Farmers have been pushed to provide standardised products at low prices,
the environmental cost of excess nitrogen runoff, pesticide and herbicide
pollution is not directly related.
Processed and fast foods have being instrumental in a reduction of health,
the cost of curing these illnesses caused by bad nutrition is not factored
into the price we pay.
The suffering of badly kept livestock is incalculable and the dangers
of diseases such as bird flues promoted by dense stocking and antibiotic
resistant bacterial infections due to routine use of antibiotics in animal
husbandry is not calculable – except when we may lose our lives.
An increase in cost to reflect the calculable indirect costs would prove
a greater burden on the poor than the rich, which seems inequitable. But
basic education in nutrition and cooking would enable the production of
good quality food from fresh ingredients by all sectors of society. Perhaps
even adding school gardens, especially vegetables and fruit would develop
skills in children that a generation has mainly lost.
Related Links
DEFRA
Economics & Statistics - National Food Survey
Defra,
UK - Environmental Protection - Water - Water Quality - Nitrates
RSPCA
Chicken Farming
Friends
of the Earth - Real Food
Soil Association
Related Books
Fast
Food Nation
Silent
Spring
The
Killing of the Countryside
The
Fatal Harvest Reader: The Tragedy of Industrial Agriculture
|