Pesticide Residues in Food Crops
History of Chemical Use in Food Production
Since man became settled and grew crops, pests and disease have been
a problem. There was little he could do to combat these for insects have
numbers on their side and spores can not be seen.
Jump forward a few thousand years and chemical weapons began to be used.
The Victorian gardener and farmer had such wonderful things as arsenic,
copper compounds and nicotine in his armoury. Combine these with artificial
fertilisers and miraculous increases in yields and visible quality arrived.
Of course these new weapons were incredibly toxic took their toll on
the users so the search went on for new ways to destroy the competition
for our food crops.
By the 1940s a new class of chemicals had come into being, organo-phosphates.
Apart from being the basis of nerve gas, which is effective at killing
people in incredibly small amounts, they could make pesticides that were
cheap and very effective. In the post war climate of food shortages and
a belief that science offered a cure for everything these were adopted
with great enthusiasm.
Concerns About Pesticides Arrive
By the 1970s we new that there were two sides to the equation. DDT had
killed billions of mosquitoes and their malaria parasites but was turning
up in the fat of polar bears and causing birth defects birds.
Obviously these chemicals needed to be tested for their effects on people
and the environment and where possible safe levels of use determined.
So, here we are today with extensive testing of chemicals before they
are approved for use and tests carried out on our foods to ensure we
are safe
Testing for Pesticide Residues
I was shocked to read on the Pesticide
Action Network about this testing.
First, in 2005, the UK government tested 37 types of food, 3,787 items
in total for between 13 and 118 types of pesticide residue. This may
seem a lot of tests but consider the tens of thousands of foods available
in the average supermarket sourced from across the world. Not very reassuring.
They published a summary of their results that showed 31.9% contained
traces of pesticides and 1.7% had levels above the legal limit know as
the Maximum Residue Level.
As if that wasn't bad enough, I quote directly from the Pesticide Action
Network
"Bad though this may seem it is not the full
story. The MRLs which the government use as their
standard in these studies is not set according to human safety levels.
Rather it means that if a farmer adheres to ‘good
agricultural practice’ their produce should not contain residues
above the MRL. The Pesticide Action Network UK have now carried
out a study to determine whether these legal limits
are above or below human safety levels. They took seven
of the foods most likely to contain pesticide residues and looked at
the 36 pesticides that are found regularly or which most frequently exceed
the MRL. The research suggests that, of these 36 pesticides, 19 have
MRLs that are NOT set below the safety level for one or more of these
seven foods. This indicates that even where pesticides are found below
the MRL in many cases the levels found will still exceed human safety
levels."
Safe Levels of Pesticide Residue?
Now, apart from what we eat in our food, the world is full of chemicals
that do not naturally occur or are normally present at very low levels
and these inevitably will find their way into our food chains and our
body. At the same time, I would question the concept of a 'safe level
of pesticide'.
You can test and establish a harmful dose for single chemical but it
is not practical to establish what happens when you combine a chemical
with one or more other chemicals. Just taking our 118 pesticide means
we would need to test 118 raised to the power of 118 to cover the possibilities.
Just raising 118 to the power of ten gives the following number: 523,383,555,379,857,000,000
I wonder why we have so many cases of asthma and eczema nowadays, what
was a rare condition is becoming the norm. Who knows what other illnesses
are developing and increasing due to the continual chemical onslaught
on our bodies?
Organic Growers Misguided?
I've also noticed many organic growers tend to have a faith that old
remedies and potions made from 'natural' products such as plants are
safe. Even nicotine sprays made from old cigarette ends are considered
safe, although nicotine is a very strong poison that can easily kill
a child if drunk and will kill both beneficial and harmful insects.
Selective Breeding - the way forward?
The news is not all bad, developments such as Sarpo blight resistant
potatoes and breeding brassicas that resist club root means that we can
enjoy high yields without the addition of invisible and tasteless pesticide
and other chemical residues.
By growing our own food or buying certified organic foods we can reduce
the chemical insult to our system and hopefully the development of new
varieties will reduce the cost of wholesome foods.
Resources
Pesticide Action Network
The Soil Association
Garden Organic (HDRA) |